Bad Tushy is all about the rear ends of gorgeous babes getting spanked, paddled and belted.
Bad Tushy states that it has been ‘totally revamped for 2010’ and has achieved this by bringing new content, 100% exclusive updates and quick loading streams to its member’s area. It claims to be a hub for spanking, paddling, school discipline and many other forms of ass torture that you would expect from a site that specializes in unique spanking action. So you’ve seen the tour and the site looks good, but can BadTushy.com deliver what it says it will? Porn Rewards took a butchers inside the member’s area to find out.
I can’t exactly say that the member’s area looks as if it’s been ‘revamped’. The site design for BadTushy.com wasn’t really that appealing but it didn’t look too bad to navigate on the whole. One real negative to the site was the fact that it was literally crammed with adverts. Between every couple of sets there was a link to a ‘free escort locator’ which really got in the way of proper site usage. Now I’m not usually that bothered by ads simply because they’re part of the site’s monetary gain, but in such an excess it really does look unattractive.
Bad Tushy does seem to have a very large archive of content. There were a total of 16 archive pages on the site and they each had about 20 updates on them. Every scene has a set of pictures as well as a video that can be downloaded or streamed. The images offered sadly can’t be downloaded in a zipped photo set and they only come in at a very poor resolution of 700 x 466 pixels. The videos on the site seem to be offered in random formats although I did find the WMV downloads were offered in a consistent format of 640 x 480 pixels at a 1.5 Mb/s bitrate. The scenes lasted around 10 to 20 minutes in length and the downloads averaged between 150 to 200 MB each.
I’m really not too sure on Bad Tushy. While I think the content is quite good and the site is clearly full of quality media, the lack of linear formats and small image resolutions really is a problem. If you’re happy with these shortcomings then by all means join, but I personally think users will be better off spending a short amount of time locating a decent site with even better spanking content. That being said, the decision is yours and I don’t think anyone could be disappointed with the member’s area if they are a serious lover of the ass whipping niche.
| Value for money: | 6 |
| Quality: | 7 |
| Quantity: | 8 |
| Updates: | 4 |
| Entertainment value: | 8 |
| Interface/design: | 7 |
| Promise: | 8 |
| Interaction: | 7 |
| Speed: | 8 |
| Originality: | 10 |
Fun tush spanking content, but the site itself doesn't support it well.
